Forms and Functions of Illocutionary Acts in the Indonesian Presidential Candidate Debate 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v5i1.977Keywords:
Presidential Debate, Pragmatics, Speech, IllocutionAbstract
The presidential debate is a crucial moment in the democratic process, where candidates convey their vision, mission, and work programs directly to the public. This study aims to analyze the form and function of illocutionary speech acts in the Indonesian presidential candidate debate in 2024. The approach used is descriptive qualitative with the theoretical basis of pragmatics, in the category of speech act forms using the theory of Ibrahim (1993), while the category of speech act functions using the theory of Yule (2006). The data were obtained from the transcript of the presidential debate broadcast by the General Election Commission (KPU RI) through the official YouTube channel. This research focuses on three sessions, namely, the first, third, and fifth debates involving the three presidential candidates. The analysis shows that there is a variety of categories of forms and functions of illocutionary speech acts. Among these categories, commissive speech acts are most dominantly used, showing the candidates' efforts to build political commitment and shape their self-image before the public. The findings confirm the importance of the strategic function of speech acts in political communication and contribute to the study of pragmatics and political discourse in Indonesia
Downloads
References
Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Cahyani, Tiara. & Gunawan, Hafiz. (2024). “Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dalam Debat Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden 2024.” Jurnal Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu 13(02).
Haryoko, S.H., Bahartiar, & Arwandi, F. (2020). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar:Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Hernita, at.al. (2024). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dan Komisif Dalam Debat Calon Presiden Republik Indonesia 2024 Pada Youtube Akun Tv One News. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran 5(1)
Ibrahim, A. S. (1993). Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya:Usaha Nasional.
Juwita, S. R. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dan Komisif Dalam Debat Calon Presiden Republik Indonesia 2014:Studi Kasus Wacana. Jurnal Eduscience 3(1):37–48.
Kartika, D. &. Katubi. (2022). Tindak Tutur Dan Kesantunan. Tasikmalaya: Perkumpulan Rumah Cermelang Indonesia.
Khasanah, Rima. et al.'s (2024), Analisis Tindak Tutur Komisif Capres Pada Debat Ke Lima Pemilu 2024. Student Research Journal 2(4)
Machendrawaty, N. & Kusnawan, M. (2003). Teknik Debat Dalam Islam. Bandung:CV Pustaka Setia.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. Harlow:Pearson Education.
Moleong, M.A., Lexy. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nadar, F. X. (2013). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.
Rahardi, K. (2019). Pragmatik Konteks Intralinguistik dan Konteks Ekstralinguistik. Yogtakarta:Amara Books.
Rasyid, F. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Kediri: IAIN Kediri Press.
Rusminto, N. R. (2015). Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.
Sahir, S. H. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta:KBM Indonesia.
Saleh, S. (2017). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bandung:Pustaka Ramadhan.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Act: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. New Work :Cambridge University Press.
Wati, L., Saman, S., &. Sanulita H. (2018). “Tindak Tutur Komisif Dalam Debat Publik Calon Walikota Dan Wakil Walikota Singkawang Tahun 2017.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa 7(10).
Wijayana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta:Andi Offset.
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta:Putaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salma Kurnia Anisa, Nur Lailiyah, Sujarwoko Sujarwoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/