Content and Language Integrated Learning in Writing in the Junior High School

https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v3i2.435

Authors

Keywords:

CLIL, Writing, Descriptive Text, Procedure Text

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the steps and writing competency implemented through CLIL in writing. This research is aimed at seventh-grade students in the Junior High School at SMPN 4 Busungbiu, Singaraja. The participants of students in the Junior High School were 30 students in one class. The first time, the researcher found the diagnostic of students writing competency in SMPN 4 Busungbiu. The mixed method combining descriptive qualitative and quantitative was applied in this study. The data collected by Classroom research that determined by who does such as the teacher, the research then used a syntax, lesson plan (RPP), and rubric as the instruments. The result of students writing competency is seen by the writing component, namely: 1) Title, 2) Topic sentence, 3) Develop Topic Sentence, 4) Grammatical, 5) Vocabulary, and 6) Punctuation.  There were 73.3% students had corrected in writing descriptive text based on seven components of writing. Almost same with descriptive text, there were 70% students had corrected in writing procedure text. The result showed a significant increase in students’ writing competency after being implemented CLIL method by the teacher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A., & Farheen, Z. (2019). Qualitative v/s. Quantitative Research- A Summarized Review. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6(43), 2828–2832. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/587

Baxter, R., Hastings, N., Law, A., & Glass, E. J. . (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Animal Genetics, 39(5), 561–563.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, January 2008, 139–157.

De Diezmas, E. N. M. (2016). The impact of CLIL on the acquisition of L2 competences and skills in primary education. International Journal of English Studies, 16(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2016/2/239611

Deswila, N., Kustati, M., Besral, B., & Sukandi, S. S. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Approach across Curriculum in Science Classrooms: Are the English Language Use and Learning Reveal? Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.4

Fernández Abarca, M. (2011). Interaction in the English classroom; An exploratory study. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v4i1.9044

Hilma Amalia, Fuad Abdullah, A. S. F. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(January), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904066

Khasinah, S. (2013). Classroom Action Research. Jurnal Pionir, Volume 1, Nomor 1, 1(2), 33–61.

Khoiriyah, K. (2021). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Indonesian Context: an Overview. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i3.202110

Kusmayadi, Y., & Suryana, Y. (2017). Improving Students’ Factual Report Writing Skill by Using Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Method. Indonesian EFL Journal, 3(1), 21–30.

Mahayani, T., . S., Chodijah, S., & Ainiyah, A. (2018). Improving Syntax Learning Achievement throughLesson Study Based Learning on IV Semester Students of Indonesian Language and Letter Education Study Program Pakuan University. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 2(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v2i1.815

Martínez, A. C. L. (2017). Analysis Of the Effect of CILL Programmes on The Written Competence of Secondary Education Students. 169–184.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Olasile Babatunde Adedoyin. (2020). QualitativeResearchMethods.

P. Ball, K. Kelly, and J. C. (2015). Putting CLIL into Practice. ELT Journal, 72(1), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx063

Ratnawati, R. (2017). Developing a Lesson Plan for Teaching English for Specific Purposes To Adult Learners At a Private University. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 1(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v1i2.1729

Sari, E. K., & Fitrawati. (2018). Brainwriting in Helping Senior High School Students Doing Brainstorming in Writing Process. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 531–537. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt

Sepang, K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Suprianti, G. A. P. (2021). Exploring Influence of Virtual Reality-Based English Learning Activities Towards Secondary Students’ English Writing Achievement. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v1i1.88

Sesiorina, S. (2014). The Analysis of Teachers’ Lesson Plan in Implementing Theme-Based Instruction for Teaching English to Young Learners. Journal of English and Education, 2(1), 84–95.

Theodosiou, C. G. (2016). Content and Language Integrated Learning (Clil): an Experimental Study on Clil Compatibility With the Modern Greek Educational System. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v4i2.330

Yuliani, S., Khulaifiyah, K., & Idayani, A. (2015). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) For Achieving Positive Outcomes of Students College. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang.

Yulianti, S., Nuraeni, S., & Parmawati, A. (2019). Improving Students’ Writing Skill Using Brainswriting Strategy. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(5), 714. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i5.p714-721

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Antari, P. D. J. . (2023). Content and Language Integrated Learning in Writing in the Junior High School. Journal of Educational Study, 3(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v3i2.435