Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Language Function at Tourist Places Signboard in Banjar Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36663/jolles.v2i2.760Keywords:
Linguistic Landscape, Languages Function, Tourist PlacesAbstract
This research aims to identify signboards at three tourist places in Banjar District, namely Brahmavihara Arama Banjar, Air Panas Banjar and Krisna Funtastic Land in terms of the function of the language on the signboards and the languages used on the signboard. This research was designed using qualitative descriptive research and data collection was carried out using observation and documentation techniques from signboards at three tourist attractions in Banjar District, namely Brahmavihara Arama, Banjar Hot Springs, and Krisna Funtastic Land. The function of language on public space signs in three tourist attractions in Banjar District (Brahmavihara Arama, Banjar Hot Springs and Krisna Funtastic Land) was found to be informational, symbolic, mythological and commercial. These four functions were analyzed based on the theory from Yanhong and Rungruang (2013) regarding the function of language on public space signs. The result of this research found that information functions, commercial functions and mythological functions are found on public signs at the three tourist places, namely Brahmavihara Arama Banjar, Banjar Hot Springs and Krisna Funtastic Land. Meanwhile, symbolic functions are only found in two tourist attractions, namely Krisna Funtastic Land and Brahmavihara Arama Banjar. And the language used on the public space signs at these three tourist places uses more than one language or is called bilingual public space signage.
Downloads
References
Azmi, N. (2017). The Benefits of Using ICT in the EFL Classroom: From Perceived Utility to Potential Challenges. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 111–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p111
Azzayati, I. (2023). Sign Language Education in Primary School “Case of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Pupils in Ain Temouchent, Algeria.” University of Ain Temouchent.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity (Vol. 18). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419
Bühler, K. (2011). Theory of Language :The representational function of language. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164
Christomy, T., & Yuwono, U. (2004). Semiotika Budaya. Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Budaya.
Coulmas, F. (2009). Evaluating Merit—The Evolution of Writing Reconsidered. Writing Systems Research, 1(1), 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / John W. Creswell. In Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed M ethods Approaches (4th ed.). Singapore: Sage Publication, 2014.
Diana, P. N., Wildaniyah, T., Oktavia, T. A. T., & Ekawati, R. (2022). Landscape Linguistic of Sumenep Tourism Destination in the New Normal Era. Prosodi, 16(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v16i1.13379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v16i1.13379
Gorter, D. (2006). Introduction: The Study of The Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170-001
Gorter, D. (2017). Language Education Policy and Multilingual Assessment. Language and Education, 31(3), 231–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892
Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, Gender and Course Year Influences on Student Perceptions of Teaching: Explorations and Implications. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120100364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120100364
Hornsby, M. (2008). The Incongruence of the Breton Linguistic Landscape for Young Speakers of Breton. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd538.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd538.0
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X9701610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Lou, J. J. (2016). The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography (Vol. 6). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095636
Paramarta, I. M. (2022). Balinese Language on the Street Signs in Singaraja Town, Bali: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis. Ranah Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.4197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.4197
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (2009). Linguistic Landscape Expanding the Scenery. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930960
Simamora, N. J. (2023). Pelestarian Bahasa Daerah Bali di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah SP (Stindo Profesional), 9(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46880/methoda.Vol13No2.pp126-132
Tinarbuko, S. (2008). Semiotic of Public Service Advertisement. Indonesian Journal of Communication Studies, 1(2), 63680.
Van Mensel, L., Vandenbroucke, M., & Blackwood, R. (1997). Linguistic Landscapes. In Oxford Handbook of Language and Society. Oxford University Press Oxford.
Yanhong, M. U., & Rungruang, A. (2013). The Use of English and Chinese Predicates by Thai University Students. Journal of Sinology, 17(2), 25–44.
Yulismayanti, Y., Iye, R., Susiati, S., Harziko, H., Taufik, T., & Abida, F. I. N. (2022). Psychological Analysis of Landscape Linguistics in Public Spaces in Buru Island. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i3.22549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i3.22549
Zeng, W., & Luo, J. (2019). The Influence of Linguistic Landscape on the Image of Shenzhen. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 07, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kadek Linda Puspita Dewi, I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra, I Made Suta Paramarta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.